Monday, September 28, 2015
Brancy again opens her maw about a topic she doesn't know shit about
Sarah Palin's daughter Bristol Palin published a brain fart of a blog post Monday in which she wondered, "What's the Difference Between Hillary Clinton and Anna Duggar?"
Palin isn't trolling us. This is a sincere question that has her so flummoxed that she's looking to you, dear reader, for an answer. Here's the entire post:
Why are people so looking down on Anna Duggar for choosing what she thinks is best for her family, when Hillary Clinton stuck by her man?
Please tell me what is the difference?
I don't understand why Anna is receiving so much criticism (where our opinions are really not needed). I was only 7 or 8 when Bill Clinton's sexual affairs were being made public, so I don't remember much about it. But it certainly seems like Hillary was empowered by her decision to stick by Bill, wasn't she?
What is the difference? Is it Anna's evangelical Christian faith?
Hillary Clinton and Anna Duggar have both stood by cheating husbands, you see, so why are we harsh on one woman and not the other? First of all, plenty of people called Hillary an enabler during and after the scandal, but it's been over 20 years and, you know, a few other things have happened in the Clintons' lives since 1992 so we're not talking about it all that much. The other big difference, of course, is that Bill Clinton had an extramarital affair with another woman, while Josh Duggar — who, yes, has admitted to having dating accounts on Ashley Madison and OkCupid — also allegedly molested five children, including two of his siblings.
Few things are quite as unambiguously horrible as child molestation, so I hope this explanation helps Palin figure out her answer.
Butthole (yes I know it's Nancy French doing the "writing" but Butthole Palin's name is on it) you really need to shut up. Bill Clinton is not a child molester, but Josh Duggar is.